pitrou commented on issue #33: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/issues/33#issuecomment-2613946318
> I have also checked https://github.com/man-group/sparrow. TBH, I like its design and simplicity but a little bit concerned about its adoption outside of its sponsors. Maybe we need more voices from the project maintainers to make a fair decision? [@pitrou](https://github.com/pitrou) Well, I'm not part of the maintainers so I can't really say anything concrete. Perhaps @johanmabille wants to shed a bit of light on future prospects for sparrow, and whether it's a good idea to rely on it at this point. (perhaps sparrow passing the cross-implementation integration tests should be a first milestone before considering it) It also depends whether Arrow would be a public or private dependency for iceberg-cpp. If a public dependency, going for nanoarrow is certainly safer at this point. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
