rdblue commented on code in PR #11919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11919#discussion_r1907595448
##########
core/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/avro/AvroTestHelpers.java:
##########
@@ -126,9 +139,18 @@ private static void assertEquals(Type type, Object
expected, Object actual) {
assertThat(actual).as("Primitive value should be equal to
expected").isEqualTo(expected);
break;
case STRUCT:
- assertThat(expected).as("Expected should be a
Record").isInstanceOf(Record.class);
- assertThat(actual).as("Actual should be a
Record").isInstanceOf(Record.class);
- assertEquals(type.asStructType(), (Record) expected, (Record) actual);
+ assertThat(expected)
Review Comment:
The problem with this approach is that it allows the struct types to be
mixed. If for some reason the reader produced a top-level Avro
`GenericData.Record` but nested structs were `StructLike`, this would allow it
as long as the expected value passed in matches. Unfortunately, it's not
uncommon for people to submit PRs where the expected values are set to whatever
makes tests pass.
Given the amount of code here, I'd prefer to either add a boolean flag to
the `private` methods or use a separate set of methods so that the record class
is validated using the same logic throughout.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
