lidavidm commented on issue #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/issues/2#issuecomment-2524781385
> Another possibility perhaps would be an IO-less abstraction (the Iceberg library tells you what it is waiting for, and you give it what it asks for). Probably more complex to design (and you still perhaps want convenience libraries on top), but definitely more flexible. I've long thought a big failing of parquet-cpp is that it _isn't_ architected like this. It's caused me a lot of pain across multiple companies. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
