jasonf20 commented on code in PR #10962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10962#discussion_r1860955258


##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/MergingSnapshotProducer.java:
##########
@@ -833,7 +833,17 @@ public List<ManifestFile> apply(TableMetadata base, 
Snapshot snapshot) {
         filterManager.filterManifests(
             SnapshotUtil.schemaFor(base, targetBranch()),
             snapshot != null ? snapshot.dataManifests(ops.io()) : null);
-    long minDataSequenceNumber =
+
+    long minNewFileSequenceNumber =

Review Comment:
   One note on this. Since I created this PR, this 
[PR](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11131/files) changed the way the 
`filtered` manifest list is calculated and I don't believe my test reproduces 
the issue anymore if you undo the code fix. 
   
   However, I think the fix is still correct and these the minSequenceNumber of 
the current operation should still be considered in addition to the filtered 
list.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to