stevenzwu commented on code in PR #10678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10678#discussion_r1696192362
##########
api/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/PartitionSpec.java:
##########
@@ -427,13 +429,21 @@ private void checkForRedundantPartitions(PartitionField
field) {
dedupFields.put(dedupKey, field);
}
+ public Builder caseSensitive(boolean sensitive) {
+ this.caseSensitive = sensitive;
+ return this;
+ }
+
public Builder withSpecId(int newSpecId) {
this.specId = newSpecId;
return this;
}
private Types.NestedField findSourceColumn(String sourceName) {
- Types.NestedField sourceColumn = schema.findField(sourceName);
+ Types.NestedField sourceColumn =
+ this.caseSensitive
+ ? schema.findField(sourceName)
+ : schema.caseInsensitiveFindField(sourceName);
Review Comment:
the question is really meant for @rdblue and @RussellSpitzer :) There is
also the question of engine interoperability on case sensitivity. If the table
is defined as case insensitive, ideally validation should reject the schema
that @dramaticlly pointed out.
```
table {
1: id: required int
2: data: required string
3: DATA: required string
}
```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
