amogh-jahagirdar commented on code in PR #9695:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9695#discussion_r1683757259
##########
open-api/rest-catalog-open-api.yaml:
##########
@@ -3647,6 +3786,173 @@ components:
type: integer
description: "List of equality field IDs"
+ PreplanTableRequest:
+ type: object
+ required:
+ - table-scan-context
+ properties:
+ table-scan-context:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/TableScanContext'
+
+ PlanTableRequest:
+ type: object
+ required:
+ - table-scan-context
+ properties:
+ table-scan-context:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/TableScanContext'
+ plan-task:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/PlanTask'
+ stats-fields:
+ description:
+ A list of fields that the client requests the server to send
statistics
+ in each `FileScanTask` returned in the response
+ type: array
+ items:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/FieldName'
+
+ TableScanContext:
+ anyOf:
Review Comment:
I see, I think it's actually quite the same case but I think technically
`TableUpdate` may need to be `oneOf` since those refs are mutually exclusive. I
missed the discriminator notation, so that also makes the different types
mutually exclusive, at least logically it's the same spec. But the example in
https://swagger.io/docs/specification/data-models/inheritance-and-polymorphism/
shows `oneOf` as well.
I think this may be a case where it should be `oneOf` on a technicality but
to a spec reader and a client it's still fairly clear due to the discriminator
usage, so arguably not worth going through a whole spec change since it doesn't
really add much value. I'm fine as it is.
cc @nastra @rdblue @danielcweeks in case they had any opinions on this
##########
open-api/rest-catalog-open-api.yaml:
##########
@@ -3642,6 +3781,173 @@ components:
type: integer
description: "List of equality field IDs"
+ PreplanTableRequest:
+ type: object
+ required:
+ - table-scan-context
+ properties:
+ table-scan-context:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/TableScanContext'
+
+ PlanTableRequest:
+ type: object
+ required:
+ - table-scan-context
+ properties:
+ table-scan-context:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/TableScanContext'
+ plan-task:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/PlanTask'
+ stats-fields:
+ description:
+ A list of fields that the client requests the server to send
statistics
+ in each `FileScanTask` returned in the response
+ type: array
+ items:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/FieldName'
+
+ TableScanContext:
+ anyOf:
+ - $ref: '#/components/schemas/SnapshotScanContext'
+ - $ref: '#/components/schemas/IncrementalSnapshotScanContext'
+
+ BaseTableScanContext:
+ discriminator:
+ propertyName: table-scan-type
+ mapping:
+ snapshot-scan: '#/components/schemas/SnapshotScanContext'
+ incremental-snapshot-scan:
'#/components/schemas/IncrementalSnapshotScanContext'
+ type: object
+ required:
+ - table-scan-type
+ properties:
+ table-scan-type:
+ type: string
+
+ SnapshotScanContext:
+ description: context for scanning data in a specific snapshot
+ type: object
+ allOf:
+ - $ref: '#/components/schemas/BaseTableScanContext'
+ required:
+ - table-scan-type
+ properties:
+ table-scan-type:
+ type: string
+ enum: ["snapshot-scan"]
+ select:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/SelectedFieldNames'
+ filter:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/Filter'
+ case-sensitive:
+ description: If field selection and filtering should be case
sensitive
+ type: boolean
+ default: true
+ snapshot-id:
+ description:
+ The ID of the snapshot to use for the table scan.
+ If not specified, the snapshot at the main branch head will be
used.
+ type: integer
+ format: int64
+ use-snapshot-schema:
+ description:
+ If the schema of the specific snapshot should be used instead of
the table schema.
+ type: boolean
+ default: false
+
+ IncrementalSnapshotScanContext:
+ description:
+ Context for scanning data appended in a range of snapshots.
+ The scan always follows the schema of the snapshot at the main branch
head.
+ type: object
+ allOf:
+ - $ref: '#/components/schemas/BaseTableScanContext'
+ required:
+ - table-scan-type
+ - start-snapshot-id
+ properties:
+ table-scan-type:
+ type: string
+ enum: ["incremental-snapshot-scan"]
+ select:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/SelectedFieldNames'
+ filter:
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/Filter'
+ case-sensitive:
+ description: If field selection and filtering should be case
sensitive
+ type: boolean
+ default: true
+ start-snapshot-id:
+ description: The ID of the starting snapshot of the incremental scan
+ type: integer
+ format: int64
+ inclusive-start:
+ description: If the data appended in the start snapshot should be
included in the scan
+ type: boolean
+ default: false
+ end-snapshot-id:
+ description:
+ The ID of the inclusive ending snapshot of the incremental scan.
+ If not specified, the snapshot at the main branch head will be
used as the end snapshot.
+ type: integer
+ format: int64
+
+ FieldName:
Review Comment:
This is a great point @syun64 , since the protocol relies on field names
instead of field IDs (which makes sense, otherwise it's too clunky for clients)
then we need something to distinguish nested vs fields with a ".".
1. logical separator ".". @jackye1995 mentioned `%1f`?
2. Some sort of function to wrap: I don't think I'd use a quoting function
or any function which wraps any other special characters since that's a pain
for users with those characters.
3. Send the nested structure as an array of arrays. This would work but I
think makes it a bit more difficult for clients (at least more difficult than
approach 1 in my mind)
I can get behind %1f since it's a standard delimiter and we already use it
for namespace and it seems the easiest for clients to handle. I'm also OK with
3.
I'll think about it more though if there are other options.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
