adutra commented on PR #10314: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10314#issuecomment-2205848299
> @adutra I've read RFC 6749 but as I mentioned in [#10314 (comment)](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10314#discussion_r1601201951) I'm assuming that the token exchange is following RFC 8693 (and my assumption can be wrong). It would be good to get confirmation on that though. Sure, but RFC 8693 is not applicable here. All depends on the grant type being used. If the grant type is `urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:access_token` then yes, RFC 8693 applies, and yes, there is an `issued_token_type` field in the response, and yes it is a required field. But if the grant type is `client_credentials` then RFC 6749 applies instead, and the field is not part of it _at all_. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
