pvary commented on code in PR #10208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10208#discussion_r1576638673
##########
flink/v1.19/flink/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/flink/source/TestIcebergSourceFailover.java:
##########
@@ -40,24 +44,27 @@
import org.apache.iceberg.FileFormat;
import org.apache.iceberg.Schema;
import org.apache.iceberg.Table;
+import org.apache.iceberg.TableProperties;
import org.apache.iceberg.data.GenericAppenderHelper;
import org.apache.iceberg.data.RandomGenericData;
import org.apache.iceberg.data.Record;
import org.apache.iceberg.flink.FlinkConfigOptions;
+import org.apache.iceberg.flink.FlinkReadOptions;
import org.apache.iceberg.flink.HadoopTableResource;
import org.apache.iceberg.flink.SimpleDataUtil;
import org.apache.iceberg.flink.TestFixtures;
import org.apache.iceberg.flink.sink.FlinkSink;
import org.apache.iceberg.flink.source.assigner.SimpleSplitAssignerFactory;
import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.Lists;
+import org.awaitility.Awaitility;
import org.junit.ClassRule;
import org.junit.Rule;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.rules.TemporaryFolder;
public class TestIcebergSourceFailover {
- private static final int PARALLELISM = 4;
+ private static final int PARALLELISM = 2;
Review Comment:
So we have more splits than reader. Otherwise the first checkpoint will
complete only after every split I assigned. The bug still exist, but the test
might cover more things this way
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
