nastra commented on code in PR #10037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10037#discussion_r1542559775


##########
spark/v3.5/spark-extensions/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/extensions/TestMigrateTableProcedure.java:
##########
@@ -232,4 +232,25 @@ public void testMigrateEmptyTable() throws Exception {
     Object result = scalarSql("CALL %s.system.migrate('%s')", catalogName, 
tableName);
     assertThat(result).isEqualTo(0L);
   }
+
+  @TestTemplate
+  public void testMigrateWithParallelism() throws IOException {
+    assumeThat(catalogName).isEqualToIgnoringCase("spark_catalog");
+    String location = Files.createTempDirectory(temp, 
"junit").toFile().toString();
+    for (int p = -1; p <= 2; p++) {

Review Comment:
   yes but we don't want to do it in a loop. If something fails, it won't be 
clear with which parallelism parameter it failed. Using loops inside tests is a 
sign that this should be either a parameterized test or just a separate test 
method with a different input



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to