pvary commented on issue #9948: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9948#issuecomment-1999013848
@VidakM: I suggest to bring this up on the mailing list. I would also love to see this feature in Flink. I checked myself a few months ago, and the main blocker is that the planning part for streaming V2 tables is not implemented yet. The interfaces are created, but there is no working implementation for planning. Also the proposed interfaces have a base class different than the one returned by the V1 planning, which will make it harder to do the implementation part on the execution engine side. Seeing these tasks, I started to work on the Flink in-job compaction, as it have more immediate gains for us, but in the medium term (in a year), I would like to revisit this feature. (No commitment though) If you need reviewers, then I could help there, so any contribution would be welcome here! Thanks, Peter -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
