rahil-c commented on code in PR #9660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9660#discussion_r1482222698


##########
open-api/rest-catalog-open-api.yaml:
##########
@@ -212,6 +212,34 @@ paths:
           schema:
             type: string
           example: "accounting%1Ftax"
+        - name: pageToken
+          in: query
+          description:
+            Allows clients to make use of pagination by signaling to the 
service that they would
+            prefer requests to be paginated to a “reasonable” number of 
results.
+            
+            New Clients always start the request by sending a required empty 
“pageToken” e.g. GET /tables?continuationToken=””
+            Servers supporting pagination would recognize pagination is 
requested due to the presence of the pageToken
+            and honor the contracts specified above by returning a non-empty 
continuation token
+            if there are more results available, or an empty token or missing 
field indicating no more results.
+            Servers that are non-pagination aware will ignore the token and 
return all results as they previously did.
+            
+            Old clients should not be specifying the new parameters
+            For servers that support pagination, they would notice the lack of 
“continuationToken”

Review Comment:
   > yeah this is the point we disagree. I think even when lacking a pageToken 
query parameter, the service should be able to paginate. Thoughts?
   
   Yea i think the issue is that without the `pageToken` how does the server 
tell if this is a new client that wants pagination or an old client that does 
not support it. 
   
    > Yes in that case I agree your approach is definitely more backwards 
compatible, but it is also cumbersome to even add a feature flag just for 
pagination. Let's see what others think.
   
   Sounds good I think we have flags for other REST related features but not 
sure its too much to have a flag for pagination, will follow guidance from 
community on which path allows us to move forward. 
   cc @danielcweeks @rdblue  
   
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to