ajantha-bhat commented on PR #9487: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9487#issuecomment-1906559757
> I'm reworking a bit the SQL statement to have views and tables in the same JDBC table, especially to address name atomically between table and view. When we create a view, we check if a table with the same name doesn't already exist. With the current PR, we can have mismatch if table and view are created at the same table (the lock is at JDBC table level). By having table and view in the same JDBC table (and using a column to define if it's a view or table), we insure we have atomicity here. I see. You are talking about an edge case where user is creating the view and table concurrently with the same name. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
