ajantha-bhat commented on PR #9487: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9487#issuecomment-1906542388
> In order to avoid any potential concurrency issue, I'm working on a new approach where both tables and views are store in the same JDBC Table, with a column indicating if it's a table or view. I should have this for tomorrow. The rest will be untouched, only the SQL statements. Don't jump into chaining the code again. let us discuss and come to conclusion first. Can you please elaborate the potential problem with the current PR? As per me, the current implementation of using different namespace and different tables for iceberg table and view is fine. For example, `iceberg_namespace_properties` is maintained as a different JDBC table currently instead of storing them with the same JDBC table. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
