rdblue commented on code in PR #9423:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9423#discussion_r1454213115


##########
spark/v3.5/spark-extensions/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/views/CreateIcebergView.scala:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.views
+
+import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.BinaryCommand
+import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan
+
+case class CreateIcebergView(
+  child: LogicalPlan,
+  userSpecifiedColumns: Seq[(String, Option[String])],
+  comment: Option[String],
+  properties: Map[String, String],
+  originalText: Option[String],
+  query: LogicalPlan,

Review Comment:
   Do we want the parsed logical plan here? Is the purpose to run the analyzer 
rules to make sure that it is valid?
   
   My guess is that this came from the Spark implementation, which probably 
uses the logical plan here for when there is no SQL text (which would be why 
`originalText` is optional). Unless I'm missing something, I think what we 
should do is not have the parsed query. Instead, I would have a validation that 
parses and analyzes the query and throws an exception if analysis fails 
(because of bad references, missing tables, or reliance on temporary views).



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to