rdblue commented on code in PR #9423:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9423#discussion_r1453833185


##########
spark/v3.5/spark-extensions/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/RewriteViewCommands.scala:
##########
@@ -40,6 +42,11 @@ case class RewriteViewCommands(spark: SparkSession) extends 
Rule[LogicalPlan] wi
   override def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan.resolveOperatorsUp 
{
     case DropView(ResolvedView(resolved), ifExists) =>
       DropIcebergView(resolved, ifExists)
+
+    case CreateView(r@ResolvedView(_), userSpecifiedColumns, comment, 
properties,
+    originalText, query, allowExisting, replace) =>
+      CreateIcebergView(r, userSpecifiedColumns, comment, properties, 
originalText,

Review Comment:
   Why not use the `ResolvedIdentifier` here? It looks like other rules expect 
the `UnresolvedIdentifier` to be replaced with a resolved identifier, which is 
already produced by `ResolvedView`.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to