robtandy commented on code in PR #41:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/41#discussion_r1440972324
##########
pyiceberg/io/pyarrow.py:
##########
@@ -1565,13 +1564,54 @@ def fill_parquet_file_metadata(
del upper_bounds[field_id]
del null_value_counts[field_id]
- df.file_format = FileFormat.PARQUET
df.record_count = parquet_metadata.num_rows
- df.file_size_in_bytes = file_size
df.column_sizes = column_sizes
df.value_counts = value_counts
df.null_value_counts = null_value_counts
df.nan_value_counts = nan_value_counts
df.lower_bounds = lower_bounds
df.upper_bounds = upper_bounds
df.split_offsets = split_offsets
+
+
+def write_file(table: Table, tasks: Iterator[WriteTask]) -> Iterator[DataFile]:
+ task = next(tasks)
+
+ try:
+ _ = next(tasks)
+ # If there are more tasks, raise an exception
+ raise ValueError("Only unpartitioned writes are supported:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/208";)
+ except StopIteration:
+ pass
+
+ df = task.df
+
+ file_path =
f'{table.location()}/data/{_generate_datafile_filename("parquet")}'
+ file_schema = schema_to_pyarrow(table.schema())
Review Comment:
if I have
```
df = pa.Table.from_pylist([{'a':"hello"}, {'a':"world"}])
```
Should I expect `df` to have a pa.Schema that can be converted with
`pyarrow_to_schema` ? even the modified one presented in the diff above? I
wasn't able to get either branch to work as the schema of `df` above has no
`metadata` for its fields
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
