dimas-b commented on code in PR #8909:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8909#discussion_r1378251837
##########
core/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/view/ViewCatalogTests.java:
##########
@@ -400,8 +400,15 @@ public void
replaceTableViaTransactionThatAlreadyExistsAsView() {
.buildTable(viewIdentifier, SCHEMA)
.replaceTransaction()
.commitTransaction())
- .isInstanceOf(NoSuchTableException.class)
- .hasMessageStartingWith("Table does not exist: ns.view");
+ .satisfiesAnyOf(
+ throwable ->
+ assertThat(throwable)
+ .isInstanceOf(NoSuchTableException.class)
+ .hasMessageStartingWith("Table does not exist: ns.view"),
+ throwable ->
+ assertThat(throwable)
Review Comment:
Altering code test expectation on a PR that adds a specific view
implementation does not look right to me.
If core test expectations are sub-optimal perhaps we can adjust them in a
separate PR, the rebase the Nessie view PR.
That said, I think the exception thrown in this test case should be the same
across all catalog implementations. WDYT?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
