amogh-jahagirdar commented on code in PR #8860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8860#discussion_r1362487232
##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/BaseFile.java:
##########
@@ -460,6 +460,12 @@ public ByteBuffer keyMetadata() {
@Override
public List<Long> splitOffsets() {
+ // If the last split offset is past the file size this means the split
offsets are corrupted and
+ // should not be used
+ if (splitOffsets != null && splitOffsets[splitOffsets.length - 1] >=
fileSizeInBytes) {
Review Comment:
Actually, `TestManifestReader` seems better for verifying the split offsets
are null when reading the file entries. This seems like a cleaner test since
split planning tests already verify the behavior when explicit split offsets
aren't defined. Manifest reader tests can help us explicitly verify the
behavior when the offsets are corrupted.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
