ndimiduk commented on code in PR #124: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase-thirdparty/pull/124#discussion_r1776700549
########## hbase-thirdparty-bom/pom.xml: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> +<project xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; + xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";> + <!-- + /** + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + + + ON MVN COMPILE NOT WORKING + + If you wondering why 'mvn compile' does not work building HBase + (in particular, if you are doing it for the first time), instead do + 'mvn package'. If you are interested in the full story, see + https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6795. + + --> + <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> + <parent> + <groupId>org.apache.hbase.thirdparty</groupId> + <artifactId>hbase-thirdparty</artifactId> + <version>${revision}</version> + <relativePath>..</relativePath> + </parent> + <artifactId>hbase-thirdparty-bom</artifactId> + <name>Apache HBase Thirdparty - BOM</name> + <description> + Bill of Materials for dependencies common to HBase Thirdparty and HBase main code + </description> + <packaging>pom</packaging> + <dependencyManagement> + <dependencies> + <dependency> + <groupId>com.google.protobuf</groupId> + <artifactId>protobuf-java</artifactId> + <version>${internal.protobuf.version}</version> + </dependency> + <dependency> + <groupId>io.netty</groupId> + <artifactId>netty-bom</artifactId> + <version>${netty4.version}</version> + <type>pom</type> + <scope>import</scope> + </dependency> + <dependency> + <groupId>com.google.errorprone</groupId> + <artifactId>error_prone_annotations</artifactId> + <version>${error_prone_annotations.version}</version> + </dependency> + <dependency> + <groupId>javax.servlet</groupId> + <artifactId>javax.servlet-api</artifactId> + <version>${servlet-api.version}</version> + </dependency> + <dependency> + <groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId> + <artifactId>jackson-annotations</artifactId> + <version>${jackson.version}</version> + </dependency> + <dependency> + <groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId> + <artifactId>jackson-core</artifactId> + <version>${jackson.version}</version> + </dependency> + <dependency> + <groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId> + <artifactId>jackson-databind</artifactId> + <version>${jackson.databind.version}</version> + </dependency> + </dependencies> + </dependencyManagement> + <build> + <plugins> + <plugin> + <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> + <artifactId>flatten-maven-plugin</artifactId> Review Comment: Why is the flatten plugin used for the bom? By definition, there should be no dependencies via this pom. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@hbase.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
