[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Libor Svehlak updated GUACAMOLE-1718:
-------------------------------------
Affects Version/s: 1.5.3
(was: 1.4.0)
> Configure script fails when "--with-libavformat=no" is specified
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GUACAMOLE-1718
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-1718
> Project: Guacamole
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: guacamole
> Affects Versions: 1.5.3
> Reporter: Libor Svehlak
> Priority: Major
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> {noformat}
> tar -xzf guacamole-server-1.4.0.tar.gz
> cd guacamole-server-1.4.0
> ./configure --with-libavformat=no
> {noformat}
> Output:
> {noformat}
> ....
> checking for ssize_t... yes
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> checking for AVCODEC... no
> ./configure: line 14214: .: filename argument required
> .: usage: . filename [arguments]
> {noformat}
> Reason: There seems to be a typo in {{configure.ac}} file on the line 246
> (line 14214 in generated {{configure}} script provided in the source
> package). There is specified {{[].}} instead of the correct {{{}[],{}}}:
> {noformat}
> #
> # libavformat
> #
> have_libavformat=disabled
> AC_ARG_WITH([libavformat],
> [AS_HELP_STRING([--with-libavformat],
> [use libavformat when encoding video
> @<:@default=check@:>@])],
> [].
> [with_libavformat=check])
> if test "x$with_libavformat" != "xno"
> then
> have_libavformat=yes
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([AVFORMAT], [libavformat],, [have_libavformat=no]);
> fi
> {noformat}
> Side question / suggestion for enhancement: Isn't there a build & test
> infrastructure to test that at least specification of switches (combination
> of switches) are not causing build errors? Due to large test space (amount of
> switches and their values) it would be most probably impossible to test all
> combinations nevertheless at least a basic check (e.g. nothing provided, all
> switches provided with "no" value, etc.) can help to avoid such errors in the
> future.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
