Scott,
I guess the trick is to pass SIGNAL() as the second argument, rather
than a function or a function object. If you have the specific signal
passed to connect() (not a parameter passed from outside) then the
following might work for you (assuming C++17):
template <class ReceiverT, typename SlotT>
void func(..., ReceiverT* receiver, SlotT slot)
{
// logic
// The below assumes that `sender` points to an object of type
// `Sender` with a signal `void trigger()`; make sure to change
// it in both if constexpr branches
if constexpr (std::is_same_v<SlotT, const char*>) {
QObject::connect(sender, SIGNAL(trigger()), receiver, slot);
} else
QObject::connect(sender, &Sender::trigger, receiver, slot);
// more logic
}
(after playing around, looking at values in the debugger and studying
the relevant pieces of the Qt source code)
Actually, you can extract QMetaMethod out of whatever SIGNAL()/SLOT()
gives you if you're ok to rely on the undocumented format of the string
yielded by those macros, which is "NmethodName(Type1, Type2...)"
where N is a single digit encoding whether it's a signal or a slot. So
basically it could look like:
template <class ReceiverT, typename SlotT>
void func(..., ReceiverT* receiver, SlotT slot)
{
// logic
const auto signal = &Sender::trigger; // Put the signal pmf here
if constexpr (std::is_same_v<SlotT, const char*>) {
++slot; // skip the code - relies on the internal Qt logic
const auto& rmo = receiver->metaObject();
const int slotIndex = rmo->indexOfSlot(slot);
Q_ASSERT(slotIndex >= 0);
QObject::connect(..., QMetaMethod::fromSignal(signal),
receiver, rmo->method(slotIndex));
} else
QObject::connect(..., signal, receiver, slot);
// more logic
}
Alexey Rusakov
-----Original Message-----
From: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilshei...@qt.io>
To: Scott Bloom <sc...@towel42.com>
Cc: interest@qt-project.org <interest@qt-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Interest] Convert to QMetaMethod from QObject + const
char *
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:23:37 +0000
> On 16 Aug 2022, at 22:39, Scott Bloom <sc...@towel42.com> wrote:
>
> I have a function that takes in a QObject and const char *
> signal/slot
>
> void func( …, QObject * target, const char * member )
> {
> …. logic
> QObject::connect( ….., target, member )
> … more logic
> {
>
>
> So I can call it via
>
> ….
> func( …., m_target, SLOT( XXXX )
> …
>
> it works fine
>
> I would like to modify the function so it can also take
>
> func( …., m_target, &TargetClass::XXXX
>
>
> however, I cant for the life of me figure out to convert, if its even
> possible
>
> Id prefer not to have to copy all the logic in func
>
> Is this possible?
>
> Yes, I know I can use std::enable_if, but that just copies the
> function logic
>
> Thanks
> Scott
Check QHostInfo::lookupHost for a Qt API that does that. It relies on
private Qt APIs though.
There might be C++17-ways to simplify some of that using `if
constexpr`, but the basics will probably be the same.
Volker
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
