> On Tuesday, 1 February 2022 11:12:29 PST Murphy, Sean wrote: > > So if I understand you correctly, instantiating 60,000 of them when > > you really only need one would be considered Not Advised?!?! > > Correct. > > I find it hard to believe you have a valid use-case for 60,000 deterministic > pseudo-random generators, though.
I definitely didn't! But that didn't stop me from doing it... Sean _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
