Yes good point, take care those built-in size attributes are optional, might not be there into an SVG, you might not want to count on it.
From: Interest <interest-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest <interest@qt-project.org> Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 10:53 AM To: interest@qt-project.org <interest@qt-project.org> Subject: Re: [Interest] QML Image size vs sourceSize strange things Il 23/03/21 14:16, Jérôme Godbout ha scritto: > Do you really need to same memory by reducing the source size? I think > you should left the source size alone and sample the image from the full > source. Source size for SVG doesn’t make any sense, it’s vectoriel, > doesn’t have any size, it can scale to any dimension. This isn't accurate. SVG files have a builtin "wanted" size, which is IIRC what Qt would use by default: > https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/struct.html#SVGElementWidthAttribute By explictly setting `sourceSize` you're asking Qt to rasterize the SVG at a different resolution rather than the wanted one (and downscaling when rendering). My 2 c, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
