On Friday, 30 August 2019 11:44:43 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > As for compression performance, zstd is still not as fast as lz4's > > LZ4_compress_fast - at least not in my use case. > And not only yours - even benchmark results in zstd repository [1] > demonstrate clearly that lz4 is substantially faster than zstd in both > compression and decompression. > > [1] https://github.com/facebook/zstd
I guess I mis-remembered my own benchmarks then. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel System Software Products _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
