On 14/08/2019 16.22, John Weeks wrote: > We are a small company selling a very large and complex application which is > now based on Qt open source. At the time we first considered porting to Qt > (version 4.3?) the license was very expensive for small company (six > programmers) and the evaluation period simply wasn't adequate to deciding if > it was the right way to go. So we went open-source when it became available > when Nokia took over. > > Since then, we have wished that we had a commercial license in order to get a > bit more traction on some bugs. The Qt Company wanted us to pay for all the > licensing that had accrued since we started using the LGPL version. That > up-front cost is prohibitive, so we haven't done it.
Does TQtC *not* sell commercial-level *support* without the additional commercial licensing rights (and retroactive costs)? If not, that seems like an idiotic missed opportunity... -- Matthew _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
