07.11.2018, 01:09, "René J. V. Bertin" <[email protected]>: > Thiago Macieira wrote: > >> Off-topic: no one uses bzip2 anymore. It's slow to compress, slow to >> decompress and produces worse results than xz. > > Xz is even slower, and on the machine these numbers came from that difference > is > more important in this case.
Use pxz to utilize all cores when compressing > >> Both are -O3 -march=native -g1 builds. So yes, the Clang build is smaller, >> but >> not significantly so. > > You know that significant is not a synonym for considerable, right? ;) > >> takes longer to compile or increases the size considerably", you don't >> really >> care about size. > > Off-topic, but if I can get the same performance with a smaller size, why opt > for the larger size? > >> Clang carries 9793421 bytes of debug information, while GCC produces >> 13951906. >> That's a much bigger difference. > > I know; most of my builds do have debug info so this is important to me. > I should look into using separate debug info sometime, but not if it gives > something comparable to the .dSYM folders that tend to litter my directories. > I > hate that for some reason. > > R > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
