Doesn't Xcode come with the "Instruments" application which is designed to do the things that OP is asking about? I have used it in the past for function timing and some memory issues but it has been a few years.
-- Michael Jackson | Owner, President BlueQuartz Software [e] mike.jack...@bluequartz.net [w] www.bluequartz.net <http://www.bluequartz.net> On 10/22/18, 12:26 PM, "Interest on behalf of Elvis Stansvik" <interest-bounces+mike.jackson=bluequartz....@qt-project.org on behalf of elvst...@gmail.com> wrote: Den mån 22 okt. 2018 kl 18:04 skrev Nuno Santos <nunosan...@imaginando.pt>: > > Elvis, > > I have just tried that it resulted in this. I’m not familiar with valgrind output. Does this look good to you? > > > --45024-- UNKNOWN mach_msg unhandled MACH_SEND_TRAILER option > --45024-- UNKNOWN mach_msg unhandled MACH_SEND_TRAILER option (repeated 2 times) > --45024-- UNKNOWN mach_msg unhandled MACH_SEND_TRAILER option (repeated 4 times) > --45024-- UNKNOWN mach_msg unhandled MACH_SEND_TRAILER option (repeated 8 times) > QML debugging is enabled. Only use this in a safe environment. > ==45024== > ==45024== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV) > ==45024== Access not within mapped region at address 0x18 > ==45024== at 0x1077D6E3A: _pthread_wqthread (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib) > ==45024== by 0x1077D6BE8: start_wqthread (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib) > ==45024== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack > ==45024== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but > ==45024== possible), you can try to increase the size of the > ==45024== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag. > ==45024== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608. > --45024:0:schedule VG_(sema_down): read returned -4 > ==45024== > [1] 45024 segmentation fault valgrind --tool=massif XPTO.app Hm, I'm not too familiar with valgrind output, but that looks like the application crashed due to an access violation. Perhaps you should run it in a memory error checker first to make pinpoint the violation? Valgrind has one called memcheck (--tool=memcheck). Elvis > > Thx! > > Nuno > > On 22 Oct 2018, at 16:54, Elvis Stansvik <elvst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I used valgrind with valgrind --tool=massif myApp to track down a memory issue just today actually, and it worked out great, but I don't know if it works on macOS (this was on Linux). I used massif-visualizer for visualization. > > I've been meaning to check out heaptrack but haven't gotten around to it. > > Elvis > > Den mån 22 okt. 2018 16:50Nuno Santos <nunosan...@imaginando.pt> skrev: >> >> Hi, >> >> What tool(s) do you people suggest in order to investigate where is the memory being spent on a Qt application? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Nuno >> _______________________________________________ >> Interest mailing list >> Interest@qt-project.org >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest