On 29/09/18 23:45, Roland Hughes wrote:
Roland, consider yourself on notice. Your comment about OpenZinc was fine -- even if it is a competitor, telling people about their options is the right thing to do. You can relate your experience with Qt and where things did not satisfy you. But you cannot make false assertions and stupid generalisations.I should have said Jenkins like process. You prefer Coin.https://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/08/08/coin-continuous-integration-for-qt/
You stated:
a lot of shortcuts get taken and are allowed as long as the test-nothing automated test clears Jenkins.
This is a FALSE STATEMENT, no matter if it's Jenkins or Coin or whatever CI suite Qt happens to be using. You're not off the hook.
-- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
