On 9/28/18 9:26 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
And we don't use Jenkins. This is a completely FALSE assertion, no basis in
truth, intended to do harm. It's very easily proven wrong, since the testing
is open, clearly tests and failures cause changes to be rejected. In other
words, this sentence is defamation.
Roland, consider yourself on notice. Your comment about OpenZinc was fine --
even if it is a competitor, telling people about their options is the right
thing to do. You can relate your experience with Qt and where things did not
satisfy you. But you cannot make false assertions and stupid generalisations.
I should have said Jenkins like process. You prefer Coin.
https://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/08/08/coin-continuous-integration-for-qt/
SSDD
There were no stupid generalizations.
Btw, I'm prepping a machine to take to a client site tomorrow. They have
a really widely distributed package I wrote in Qt some years ago. Anyone
who has walked into a big box or office supply store has seen it. No,
I'm not allowed to name it.
I'm returning there for a few months to participate in a re-evaluation
process. They are considering ditching Qt for Electron. Doing side by
side development on all platforms to see which works best for them. When
we stumble into one of those features we need which doesn't exist on all
platforms, there won't be any way I can continue making a case for Qt.
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630) 205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
