> On 8 Nov 2017, at 11:54, Alexander Ivash <elder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is really confusing. > > From one side, > >>> What you **don't** say is, that you "genuinely wish to treat the Qt >>> Project as an Open Governance project and that external contributions >>> are welcomed and valued." >>> >>> There must be a reason not to write this sentence. >> >> Because it goes without saying. > >> Correct, it does go without saying. > > .... but from the other: > >> The Open Governance model is the foundation of how we develop Qt. It offers >> tremendous value to our users and customers. It’s also one of the big items >> that differentiates Qt from all it’s competitors. And changing that would be >> negative for everybody, including The Qt Company. >> >> So, speaking for The Qt Company: No, there are definitely no plans to change >> that. > > So what does it mean in total? Qt stays Open Governance-driven, but no > 'genuinely' ? Or genuinely but external contributions are not > welcomed? :)
Nothing in my wording above says anything like that. > > p.s. This is not trolling of any kind, I'm really confused. I’m not sure what didn’t understand? Are you confused because I didn’t repeat the work ‘genuinely’ here? So again for clarity: All contributions are highly welcomed and valued by TQtC, and yes, we genuinely want to (and will) continue to develop Qt using the Open Governance model. Best regards, Lars _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
