This is really confusing. From one side,
>> What you **don't** say is, that you "genuinely wish to treat the Qt >> Project as an Open Governance project and that external contributions >> are welcomed and valued." >> >> There must be a reason not to write this sentence. > > Because it goes without saying. > Correct, it does go without saying. .... but from the other: > The Open Governance model is the foundation of how we develop Qt. It offers > tremendous value to our users and customers. It’s also one of the big items > that differentiates Qt from all it’s competitors. And changing that would be > negative for everybody, including The Qt Company. > > So, speaking for The Qt Company: No, there are definitely no plans to change > that. So what does it mean in total? Qt stays Open Governance-driven, but no 'genuinely' ? Or genuinely but external contributions are not welcomed? :) p.s. This is not trolling of any kind, I'm really confused. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
