It was my understanding that Herb has a somewhat working clang-based prototype ? Do you think that will be made available at some point ? It would be fun to try to properly implement Qt meta object system (maybe using Olivier's Verdigris as a starting point) and provide feedback based on that.
One other feature I'd like to see is to have access to [[attributes]] from within the static reflection api ( for which there are currently multiple competing proposals if I understand correctly ?) Corentin Le mar. 2 mai 2017 à 15:21, Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com> a écrit : > On 01/05/17 21:59, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > If not, this is vapourware. > > To clarify (I was there during Herb's talk at ACCUCONF2017): > > Herb said clearly that all of that is currently not official, not even > proposed, so the final thing (if there will be one) could also be > completely different. > > The talk was the first time this stuff got showcased publicly. It was > just neat that he used Qt (and moc) as an example of what the new syntax > would unlock. > > P0633R0 does *not* deal with Herb's proposal because there isn't one > (it's indeed quoted as "private communication"). > > My 2 c, > -- > Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer > KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company | Tel: UK +44-1625-809908 > <+44%201625%20809908> > KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
