On Monday 19 September 2016 18:35:43 Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal wrote: > Yes, but for instance you can't move-pass an object between signals and > slots across a queued connection, unless I'm wrong. You have to make your > object implicitely shared. This causes lots of copies when passing a > std::vector, for instance.
The Qt style on designing signals, is to use those for indicating that something happened, but not passing the something in the signal. For example, you get a signal that new data is available (e.g. a datagram), but you don't get the datagram passed as signal argument. Can you give an example of which signal requires passing a large std::vector as argument, and ends up being a problem? -- Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
