Qt Commercial user here. I do not like:
- Long time to get bugs fixed - QtQuick requires switching to QML and is not usable directly in C++ - Widgets development got less attention due to QtQuick development. HiDPI support was a good idea but it introduced many bugs - C++ style is a little bit outdated (no move semantics fir instance) - No OS display color profile information support Cheers, Etienne 2016-09-19 8:08 GMT+02:00 Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutle...@qt.io>: > > > On 18 Sep 2016, at 02:37, Xavier Bigand <flamaros.xav...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I am using Qt for my day job, > > > > Our first difficulty with Qt is the release cycle that is really long > and the difficulty to test the futur versions. > > As we often need the latest features or bug fixes, waiting 3-4 month > isn't possible, and some times we just implement our self features or use > workaround for bugs. > > Alpha and Beta versions aren't accessible on the Qt maintenance tool > that we use, and compiling Qt from the source is to much work for every > platforms we use,... > > > > We'll certainly don't use an Alpha or Beta version of Qt for production, > but it is interesting to be able to report bug on upcoming version as soon > as possible (especially for new features as Qt3D,...). > > Then you should use git. Yes it’s bleeding edge, but CI helps to make it > more stable than it otherwise would be. > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
