Am 22.06.16 um 12:12 schrieb Xavier Bigand: > It is good to know, I made my test with Qt5.6 and Qt Quick Controls > labs. It seems that there is some improvement since. > It seems that one of the hardest thing to simulate is the shadow with > elevation, but on your captures it seems perfect. Material.elevation property can be set in Qt 5.7 > > If I can make my personal application with Qt, it would be great, > because I dislike Android Studio. I'll do more example apps and provide recipes for Controls not available out-of-the-box ekke > > 2016-06-22 11:43 GMT+02:00 ekke <e...@ekkes-corner.org > <mailto:e...@ekkes-corner.org>>: > > Am 22.06.16 um 11:31 schrieb Xavier Bigand: >> I made few tests for a personal project with Qt Quick Controls 2 >> on Android and was not convinced. Because for a full GUI >> application it still too far from the same GUI made with the >> Android SDK. > take a look at this example app: blog http://bit.ly/qt-drawer-nav-x > and at github: https://github.com/ekke/drawer_nav_x > Drawer, Bottom Navigation, FAB, Popup, Toast, StackView, > SwipeView, Pages, ... > some fine-tuning is already in-development (have written > bugreports for this) > From my POV you can write good looking Android Material Apps > the only controls I'm missing are Date- and Time Pickers > > > I'm still evaluating, but have a good feeling that Qt 5.7 will be > great for mobile business apps I'm writing > > ekke > >> I still think that for small applications that is preferable to >> develop them with the platform SDK as they contains all features. >> But for middle and biggest applications it can be different >> especially if desktop platforms are also target. >> There is an other reason why I think that it is preferable to use >> platform SDK, it is for commercial application that want to try >> to be featured by mobile stores, it would be easier to integrate >> latest SDK features,... >> >> >> I am working on big application with a 3D engine that runs on >> mobile and desktop, we are using Qt Quick for the GUI, everything >> else is in standard C++. For feature specific to the platform >> (in-app, social,...) we use platform SDK and it's not that long >> to do the job 2 or 3 times for those features. >> >> Qt represent a big time saver for the GUI for us mainly because >> of the property binding that allow us to adapt the GUI easily and >> efficiently to the screen size, and tweak it per platform, >> product version,... >> >> And now I am trying to replace our 3D engine by qt3d to improve >> the user experience, the compatibility on desktop, the >> performances and be able to use different rendering techniques on >> desktop. >> >> >> >> >> 2016-06-22 10:45 GMT+02:00 ekke <e...@ekkes-corner.org >> <mailto:e...@ekkes-corner.org>>: >> >> Am 22.06.16 um 10:36 schrieb Bo Thorsen: >> > Den 21-06-2016 kl. 22:55 skrev Jason H: >> >> I feel like the last few releases have been run by the >> trolls, and >> >> not the users of Qt. I was hoping open governance would >> enable the >> >> community to direct Qt development, but I seem to have >> misinterpreted >> >> what it means. I'm looking for what's going into 5.8.. not >> much >> >> listed on the releases page. >> >> >> >> I'd like to suggest that mobile get some much needed love. >> >> - Application state transitions; Foreground, background >> >> - Background processing API >> >> - Screen wake lock API >> >> - In-app Notifications: local, remote >> >> >> >> While I have those characterized as "mobile" there are >> things like >> >> notifications occurring on desktop platforms. >> >> >> >> Any thoughts? >> > >> > There's only one reason why you don't see more features for >> the mobile >> > parts: There are not enough developers on it. And that's >> not because >> > QtCompany is doing anything wrong, they just have their >> priorities >> > different from what you have. >> > >> > Personally I don't care about mobile at all. I haven't had >> a mobile >> > customer since 2011 and I don't see that changing. My focus >> is almost >> > entirely on Linux embedded and Windows desktop. Those are >> the areas >> > where a lot of applications are written. >> > >> > I'd love to see the mobile platforms thrive. But unless you >> Qt users >> > start becoming Qt developers and contribute to it, I don't >> see that >> > happening. >> hmmm >> the only reason for me to use Qt is mobile >> using new Qt Quick Controls 2 Qt is a great platform for >> mobile app >> development and I hope many new developers will start with Qt >> on mobile >> to make this easier I'm writing example apps and a blog series >> http://j.mp/qt-x >> >> I really hope that there will be development on the topics >> Jason H >> mentioned above >> >> ekke >> >> > >> > Bo Thorsen, >> > Director, Viking Software. >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Interest mailing list >> Interest@qt-project.org <mailto:Interest@qt-project.org> >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Xavier > > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org <mailto:Interest@qt-project.org> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > > > > -- > Xavier
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
