On 3/16/2016 5:02 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
I find them both pretty bad L… I have spent too much time, looking at other
people’s code trying to figure out “why” it wont connect, only to realize
someone had snuck in a “private:” second so moc didn’t generate the slot
information.
I prefer “slotFoo” and “slotBar” as well as “sigFoo” and “sigBar”
It really lets the methods stand out as slots and signals.. It also means,
don’t think “sender()” can ever valid if you are not in a “slotXYZ” function.
I actually prefix my slot method names with "slot_" and signals with "signal_"
so they are also easily identifiable in the C++ module as I'm looking through
the code. More self-documentation.
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
