Em segunda-feira, 7 de março de 2016, às 20:37:24 PST, Jason H escreveu: > I now understand that is wrong, that it is just looking it up in a > translation table, and that "(s)" does not specify the string alteration. I > would assume then that the 3-parameter tr() call is what signifies that it > is to be pluralized?
Correct, it's the third argument being different from -1 that triggers the pluralisation rules. One source string may become more than one translations, depending on the target language. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
