On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal <etienne.san...@m4x.org> wrote: > This was not really a complain but just a comment, since both classes have > nearly the same interface they could derive from a common one.
To say it all, QAbstractSocket is deemed to be a mistake in Qt. There's no useful way of managing sockets through the base class API. "Static polymorphism" would've fitted just as well. My 2 c, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
