On 9 December 2015 at 20:22, Alejandro Exojo <s...@badopi.org> wrote: > El Monday 07 December 2015, Ch'Gans escribió: >> Sorry to hijack the thread a bit, but I was thinking recently about >> adding contributor projects to some sort of CI. >> >> There's some nice Qt libraries around and some nice out-of-tree >> QtCreator plugins in the wild, wouldn't it be nice if such Open Source >> projects were integrated in such CI systems? >> Even if they are clearly marked as >> unsupported/unofficial/untested/<insert-your-statement-here>? > > I've seen some open source projects use Travis CI (or Appveyor or similar) > integrated in their Github workflows to provide not only the continuous > integration (e.g. run the tests at every push) but also to provide the > compiled "artifacts" to users. > > I think it will be difficult for the Qt project to support all third party > libraries or applications out there, and I don't think that the same > infrastructure has to be shared in order to be useful to the same degree. > > However, the Qt Installer Framework has a repository system that it could be > useful for 3rd parties to provide their add-ons in a nice user interface. And > if that is too difficult, there is QPM and Qt-Pods, which already have nicely > packaged the source code.
Could you elaborate on this Qt Installer Framework repository, maybe just send a link? For those who don't know about QPM and Qt-POD (like me 5 minutes ago): - http://www.qt-pods.org (qmake based, in source tree, project dependency management) - https://www.qpm.io (project dependency building and packaging system) Haven't try them yet. Chris > > -- > Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 > http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
