On 10 Jul 2015, at 20:09, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Saturday 11 July 2015 03:03:16 John C. Turnbull wrote:
>> Yeah but I am adding royalties.
> 
> Ignoring the fact that it's difficult to monitor this and would generate even 
> more cost, at a 5% cut that would require your application to sell at least 
> $300 a month to break even with the current structure.
> 
> In the real world, because of this extra monitoring, the costs would be much 
> higher. So unless on average each Indie licence produced at least $1000 a 
> month of net sales through the app stores, it is a bad value proposition for 
> The Qt Company. Probably more.
> 


There is no sense of having monitoring overhead for collectong pennies. For 
this reason I proposed that it should be free to use Qt in mobile for less than 
some monthly revenue. I proposed 10000€ per month or something arounf that.

This will be win-win situation to Qt Company and developers because if Qt 
Company is not making profit with Indie licences and it is not pofittable 
monitor for pennies. To make money Qt Company needs successfull developers. If 
there is no entry path for indie devlopers or startups, then there won't be so 
many succesfull apps. 

Or other words, if Qt Company says no to indie and stratup developers, who will 
use Qt 
in mobile ? Desktop Qt is so mature and gives same sepeed and look and feel 
than native development kits but in mobile there is still long way to go. 
Greatest advantage to mobile Qt is that you could use same code in all 
platforms but available APIs, size, speed and stability is disadvantage. For 
indie or startup developer that does not have resources to make separate native 
implementation this is great advantage. For larger company it makes more sense 
to use more resources to develop native apps.

If Qt Companynis is saying no to small developers and larger will in any case 
use 
native, what is left ?

Kate


> -- 
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to