Suppose that I have objects deriving from QObject and want to control their
dynamic allocations for performance reasons. I would overload operator new to
allocate them, for example, into a pool. None of this is implemented in any way
yet.The objects themselves would now be allocated in the pool. However, since I
didn't overload the operator new of QObjectPrivate it would not be allocated
into the pool which partly defeats the purpose, as I still have a default
allocation.My question is: can I control the way the private parts of Qt
(specifically, QObjectPrivate) are allocated?I'd also like to verify the
following statements in the context of an LGPL license. I'd like to keep my
source closed, so modifying the Qt source directly is not possible. I'd also
rather not derive my own PIMPL object from QObjectPrivate to overload operator
new, as it would destroy binary compatibility with future versions of Qt5, even
when not using any of the QObjectPrivate members.
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
