On quarta-feira, 10 de abril de 2013 17.37.02, Thiago Macieira wrote: > The alternative is to put this code inside qmake itself, so no new binary > is created. This has the advantage that several Qt classes are already > bootstrapped, including the filesystem engine.
Uh... oops. Chicken-and-the-egg problem: to use the Qt classes, you need to have run syncqt first. Otherwise you'll get compilation errors from headers including other headers. That's probably one of the reasons why syncqt stayed a script. So, if we want this in C++, it can't use anything but the Standard Library and POSIX/Win32. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
