On 12/21/12 12:51 PM, Raul Metsma wrote: > Seems like 10.6 does not have libc++. > maybe have 2 prebuilt binaries, one with libc++ and libstdc++ > > Raul
No, it doesn't. But it's easy enough to build one targeting 10.6 and bundle it in the application. That's what we do. > On Dec 21, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Stephen Chu <step...@ju-ju.com> wrote: > >> On 12/21/12 3:17 AM, Sorvig Morten wrote: >>> >>>> Does the pre built binary use libstdc++ or libc++? >>> >>> >>> According to "otool -L", QtCore from the 5.0.0 binary links against >>> libstdc++. >> >> Doesn't that pretty much precludes us from using most C++11 features? >> Using C++11 features like initializers list with clang requires using >> the new standard libraries headers that are only available with >> -stdlib=libc++ option. That will link our binaries against libc++ and >> now we have 2 different C/C++ runtimes. >> >> That's not getting intothe mess that Qt is built with old GCC 4.2 >> headers and our binaries with libc++ ones. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
