On Saturday 16 June 2012 Jun, Michael Seydl wrote: > When there's no Qt I definitely would use boost. It's header only ... mostly > ... very portable and provides everything one could need. Asio, regex, > filesystem, spirit ... But that's the Qt mailing list don't wanna make > advertisement for another library here. ;)
If there were no Qt, yeah... I guess I would use -- Wait. I think I'd open a second-hand bookshop or something like that. I'd probably stop coding. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
