When there's no Qt I definitely would use boost. It's header only ... mostly ... very portable and provides everything one could need. Asio, regex, filesystem, spirit ... But that's the Qt mailing list don't wanna make advertisement for another library here. ;)
Sent from my iPhone On 16.06.2012, at 17:22, Boudewijn Rempt <b...@valdyas.org> wrote: > On Saturday 16 June 2012 Jun, Michael Seydl wrote: >> I'd say one reason is the encoding awareness of QString alone is a good >> reason. Fiddling around with libicu and alike is a mess. Regarding the int >> to string thing. Who codes C++ without boost nowadays? boost::lexical_cast >> ftw. > > I actually don't know anyone directly who codes C++ _with_ boost. > > -- > Boudewijn Rempt > http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
