On terça-feira, 12 de junho de 2012 21.36.46, Jochen Becher wrote: > In my case childB is not a child of childA but both are children of > parent (widgets in the same group/layout). But childB has a reference to > childA which might be accessed in destructor.
That's a whole different problem. Accessing siblings during destruction is a
bad idea by itself.
There's only one thing worse than that: deleting a sibling.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
