Hi, Think of the following code:
QObject *parent = new QObject(); QObject *childA = new QObject(parent); QObject *childB = new QObject)parent); delete parent; In which order would you expect childA and childB gets deleted? I would expect childB first and childA second. This would be same behavior as in using normal variables: QObject parent; QObject childA(&parent); QObject childB(&parent); Here, on leaving the scope childB would be deleted first, childA second and parent last. Isn't it a bug in Qt to delete children in the same order there were added to a parent instead of the reverse order? Regards, Jochen _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
