Ah yes, but the switched from PPC to x86... ;-)
PPC is a great design. We use that here, and when we moved to a new
architecture, despite a 5x clock in crease it ran at the same or lesser speed
than the 200Mhz part. (We have a lot of i/o, which PPC excels at)
Incidentally, we are looking for 2 embedded software developers (full time,
Baltimore, MD). If anyone knows anyone who might be interested, send them my
way please. I will say our embedded use of Qt was cancelled (long story, but
not my fault ;-) ) so no Qt for now, but it is a possibility again in 2-5 years.
________________________________
From: Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru>
To: Jason H <scorp...@yahoo.com>
Cc: Atlant Schmidt <aschm...@dekaresearch.com>; "lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch"
<lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch>; "adam.weinr...@nokia.com"
<adam.weinr...@nokia.com>; "interest@qt-project.org" <interest@qt-project.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt for Android & iOS
25.04.2012, 17:17, "Jason H" <scorp...@yahoo.com>:
> I had considered that, but rejected it because Apple designs and manufactures
> its own chips. Therefore, they would change their CPU design rather than
> switch architectures.
Note that their current CPU team (ex. P. A. Semi) was once known as developers
of PowerPC-compatible CPU, so who knows...
--
Regards,
Konstantin
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
