Was a mac ‘desktop’ license used or was a Qt embedded license used to create 
the commercial plugin?  I assume desktop developer licenses.  I wonder if this 
is 100% consistent with Digias desktop license or if an exception was/needs to 
be negotiated.

Will commercial users of Ians iOS port require commercial Qt licenses to deploy 
their mac apps?    (Is think static linking may be required to get AppStore 
compliance-has that been figured out?)

From: ext Jason H [mailto:scorp...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 2:41 PM
To: Jason H; Weinrich Adam (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley); 
lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch; interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt for Android & iOS

Also the commercial plugin was made using a commercial Qt license.


________________________________
From: Jason H <scorp...@yahoo.com<mailto:scorp...@yahoo.com>>
To: "adam.weinr...@nokia.com<mailto:adam.weinr...@nokia.com>" 
<adam.weinr...@nokia.com<mailto:adam.weinr...@nokia.com>>; 
"lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch<mailto:lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch>" 
<lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch<mailto:lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch>>; 
"interest@qt-project.org<mailto:interest@qt-project.org>" 
<interest@qt-project.org<mailto:interest@qt-project.org>>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt for Android & iOS

Ian has two version the free UIKit, and the commercial version. There are many 
differences, in that the commercial uses a couple extra classes he developed to 
use the iOS libraries where required by the AppStore (WebKit, multimedia, etc). 
Also supporting multitouch and such.


________________________________
From: "adam.weinr...@nokia.com<mailto:adam.weinr...@nokia.com>" 
<adam.weinr...@nokia.com<mailto:adam.weinr...@nokia.com>>
To: scorp...@yahoo.com<mailto:scorp...@yahoo.com>; 
lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch<mailto:lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch>; 
interest@qt-project.org<mailto:interest@qt-project.org>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Interest] Qt for Android & iOS

“Embedded” is an broad term and a moving target  that always seems to require 
clarification.   AFAIU Digia wont engage in mobile consumer embedded platform 
licensing.  Android and iOS could be called ‘leading embedded platforms’ but 
are a special mass consumer case and dont generate commercial license revenue.

Digia already has public deals with RIM QNX, WindRiver VxWorks and Greenhills 
Integrity for supporting and selling Qt license to custom device makers on 
these embedded platforms.   Its great that Qt will penetrate these platform 
markets too. It may be helpful to remember that Qt “Embedded devices” have 
always had runtime distribution fees per device as well as developer licenses..

Im not expecting Digia to be involved in writing or even licensing any 
‘official’ or unofficial mobile platform ports.
I am curious about Ian’s IOS plugin commercial licensing corner case though if 
anyone can clarify that it could help the discussion.

-Adam

From: 
interest-bounces+adam.weinrich=nokia....@qt-project.org<mailto:interest-bounces+adam.weinrich=nokia....@qt-project.org>
 
[mailto:interest-bounces+adam.weinrich=nokia....@qt-project.org]<mailto:[mailto:interest-bounces+adam.weinrich=nokia....@qt-project.org]>
 On Behalf Of ext Jason H
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:59 AM
To: lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch<mailto:lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch>; 
interest@qt-project.org<mailto:interest@qt-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt for Android & iOS

They aren't embedded.
Digia means QNX, MQX (please!), embedded linux, VxWorks, on PPC, ARM, MIPS, SH, 
and the like.

________________________________
From: "lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch<mailto:lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch>" 
<lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch<mailto:lucas.betsch...@crypto.ch>>
To: interest@qt-project.org<mailto:interest@qt-project.org>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:45 AM
Subject: [Interest] Qt for Android & iOS

Quoted from digia.com<http://digia.com> 
(digia.com/en/Qt/Digia-is-Committed-to-Qt/<http://digia.com/en/Qt/Digia-is-Committed-to-Qt/>):
"
Digia is comitted to:
...
- Advancing the cross-platform Qt promise by supporting  leading ( !! ) desktop 
and embedded platforms
...
"

So we doubtless can expect an official Android and iOS port since they're 
leading embedded platforms?


_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org<mailto:Interest@qt-project.org>
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest


_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org<mailto:Interest@qt-project.org>
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to