On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Harri Pasanen <ha...@mpaja.com> wrote: > Personally for me C & C++ support are essential, as those provide access > to a wealth of ready to use libraries, like libav, opencv, etc. > They also provide the required speed improvement when starting to polish > feature complete applications. I may do the prototype/first version in > javascript+QML and then move the hot spots to C++.
Right, and I noted this in a way in my previous post perhaps not as positively as I should. It is just the vibes I'm receiving on my end (to my discontent) from local and international industry emphasizes JavaScript, HTML5 , QML (for both client *and* server, e.g. NodeJS) and other "more developer friendly" (-easier to learn and get started in speed) technologies. (a LOT of apps today are cloud data consumption apps or content and the HTML5/JS , QML is perfect for this use case) > > Good Python support in Qt is nice, although for mobile less interesting > right now because of startup cost (which QML+javascript also has to some > extent). > I would love to see PySide (personally I'm a fan) become more closer in performance to native. PySide is a rather pleasurable way and fun to Qt. > Btw. on recent poll javascript was not that popular, ~ equal to C and > C++ popularity together. > http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3746692 > > Python was the clear winner. :) My personal preference is again, Python. Which is why I love PySide so much. But it seems that "serious" apps in Qt must be written in C++. -Sivan _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
